2021
DOI: 10.1002/aic.17175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized cutting‐set approach for nonlinear robust optimization in process systems engineering

Abstract: We propose a novel computational framework for the robust optimization of highly nonlinear, non‐convex models that possess uncertainty in their parameter data. The proposed method is a generalization of the robust cutting‐set algorithm that can handle models containing irremovable equality constraints, as is often the case with models in the process systems engineering domain. Additionally, we accommodate general forms of decision rules to facilitate recourse in second‐stage (control) variables. In particular,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 38 ] The IDAES‐CMF has also been applied to a range of other problem types, such as conceptual design and process intensification [ 39 ] and dynamic real‐time optimization and control, [ 40 ] and non‐linear robust optimization. [ 41 ]…”
Section: Case Study—hda Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 38 ] The IDAES‐CMF has also been applied to a range of other problem types, such as conceptual design and process intensification [ 39 ] and dynamic real‐time optimization and control, [ 40 ] and non‐linear robust optimization. [ 41 ]…”
Section: Case Study—hda Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper focuses on such cases by replacing the non-linear functions defining the equalities by their piece-wise affine approximations that would reflect the original functions as closely as needed. Recently, some progress has been made in that direction such as the work presented in Ardestani-Jaafari and Delage 2016, Aßmann et al 2018, and Isenberg et al 2021.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results in this paper are distinct from Molzahn and Roald 2018 since in the latter work a robust solution is obtained by iteratively tightening the inequality constraints. In Isenberg et al 2021, the authors also tackle general nonlinear optimization problems but use an alternative formulation of ARO problems and thus a distinct solution strategy. Our approach is close in spirit to the approach in Roald and Andersson 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%