2016
DOI: 10.14232/ejqtde.2016.1.28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized Picard-Lindelöf theorem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So, in some sense, conditions (C1) and (C2) are sharp. Theorem 2.3 generalizes the main result in [13], where only foliations consisting of hyperplanes are considered. In the next example we show the limitations of linear (or affine) coordinate changes which are used in [13].…”
Section: Remark 24 1) Condition (21) Can Be Easily Interpreted Geosupporting
confidence: 70%
“…So, in some sense, conditions (C1) and (C2) are sharp. Theorem 2.3 generalizes the main result in [13], where only foliations consisting of hyperplanes are considered. In the next example we show the limitations of linear (or affine) coordinate changes which are used in [13].…”
Section: Remark 24 1) Condition (21) Can Be Easily Interpreted Geosupporting
confidence: 70%
“…For extensions of the Picard-Lindelöf theorem using contractions we refer the reader to [2], [3] and [4]. A different generalization was given in [6]. However, our proof is more elementary, once some local existence result is available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%