1999
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2354.00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalized Moments Estimator for the Autoregressive Parameter in a Spatial Model

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the estimation of the autoregressive parameter in a widely considered spatial autocorrelation model. The typical estimator for this parameter considered in the literature is the (quasi) maximum likelihood estimator corresponding to a normal density. However, as discussed in the paper, the (quasi) maximum likelihood estimator may not be computationally feasible in many cases involving moderate or large sized samples. In this paper we suggest a generalized moments estimator that is c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
673
0
8

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,101 publications
(703 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
673
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gaussian MLE can in general be expensive to compute due to the determinant factor, as discussed by Kelejian and Prucha (1999). However, the limit distribution of this estimate is the same as that of^ C and^ D when these are based on f (s; ) = (2 ) 1=2 exp( s 2 =2); (s; ) = s: Indeed such^ D represents a Newton step to the Gaussian MLE.…”
Section: Remark 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gaussian MLE can in general be expensive to compute due to the determinant factor, as discussed by Kelejian and Prucha (1999). However, the limit distribution of this estimate is the same as that of^ C and^ D when these are based on f (s; ) = (2 ) 1=2 exp( s 2 =2); (s; ) = s: Indeed such^ D represents a Newton step to the Gaussian MLE.…”
Section: Remark 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Kelejian and Robinson (1993) propose using instrumental variables in connection with spatial models, which leads to a new battery of tests of spatial dependence based, directly or indirectly, on the GMM principle (Anselin and Kelejian, 1997, Kelejian and Prucha, 1999, Conley, 1999, Saavedra, 2003, Kelejian and Prucha, 2004, and Fingleton, 2008 Graaff et al, 2001) and the τ test Pinkse, 1997, Pinkse et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it parallels that of Kelejian and Prucha (1998, 1999, Lee (2004Lee ( , 2007 and Lin and Lee (2010). Second, it allows us to avoid the use of trimming factors (e.g.…”
Section: Where the Elements Of Q I 'S Are Uniformly Bounded By A Consmentioning
confidence: 86%