2023
DOI: 10.1155/2023/8767131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalized Modularity for Computing Community Structure in Fully Signed Networks

Abstract: The community structure in fully signed networks that considers both node attributes and edge signs is important in computational social science; however, its physical description still requires further exploration, and the corresponding measurement remains lacking. In this paper, we present a generalized framework of community structure in fully signed networks, based on which a variant of modularity is designed. An optimization algorithm that maximizes modularity to detect potential communities is also propo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(131 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that many efforts were made to deal with such a problem, for instance, by building a quality function starting with the quality expression of a single community [29] and gaining the best partition in a confirmed number of clusters. Although, for the general case, using optimization of quality functions for identifying communities is still adopted [30][31][32].…”
Section: Quality Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is worth noting that many efforts were made to deal with such a problem, for instance, by building a quality function starting with the quality expression of a single community [29] and gaining the best partition in a confirmed number of clusters. Although, for the general case, using optimization of quality functions for identifying communities is still adopted [30][31][32].…”
Section: Quality Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…strong consistency with a growing K (number of communities) [79], [82] strong consistency: sharp threshold under sparse networks [83], [84], [85] weak consistency [86], [87] non-trivial recovery [88], [89], [90] robustness against outlier nodes [79], [91], [92] consistency under degree-corrected models [31] consistency under weak assortativity [93], [94] 6. Experimental part Many different algorithms have been proposed for network community detection, as mentioned in previous sections.…”
Section: Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%