2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2018.11.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized modified Hermitian and skew-Hermitian splitting (GMHSS) method for solving complex Sylvester matrix equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we present applications of our proposed algorithms to the certain linear matrix equations. To show the effectiveness and capability of our algorithms, we compare our proposed algorithms to the mentioned existing algorithms as well as the direct methods (3) and (11). For convenience, we abbreviate TauOpt to represent our algorithms.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations For a Class Of The Generalized Sylvestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we present applications of our proposed algorithms to the certain linear matrix equations. To show the effectiveness and capability of our algorithms, we compare our proposed algorithms to the mentioned existing algorithms as well as the direct methods (3) and (11). For convenience, we abbreviate TauOpt to represent our algorithms.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations For a Class Of The Generalized Sylvestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical applications, we solve the linear matrix equations of large dimensions by effective iterative methods. There are several ideas to formulate an iterative procedure, namely, one can use matrix sign function [5], block recursion [6,7], Krylov subspace [8,9], Hermitian and skew-Hermitian splitting [10,11], and other related research works; see, e.g., [12][13][14][15]. In the recent decade, the ideas of gradients, hierarchical identification and minimization of associated norm-error functions have encouraged and brought about many researches; see, e.g., [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Dehghan and Shirilord, 30,31 double‐step scale splitting (DSS) approaches were used to solve complex Sylvester matrix equation. Dehghan and Shirilord extended the modified Hermitian and skew‐Hermitian splitting (MHSS) method for solving large sparse Sylvester equation with non‐Hermitian and complex symmetric positive definite/semidefinite matrices 32 . Dehghan and Hajarian extended the CG method for finding the least Frobenius norm generalized centrosymmetric and central anti‐symmetric solutions of general coupled matrix equations 33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Hajarian [15] established the matrix form of the biconjugate residual (BCR) algorithm for computing the generalized reflexive (anti-reflexive) solutions of the generalized Sylvester matrix equation P [16] established some conditions for the existence and the representations for the Hermitian reflexive, anti-reflexive, and non-negative definite reflexive solutions to the matrix equation AX = B with respect to a generalized reflection P by using the Moore-Penrose inverse. Dehghan and Shirilord [17] presented a generalized MHSS approach for solving large sparse Sylvester equation with non-Hermitian and complex symmetric positive definite/semi-definite matrices based on the MHSS method. Dehghan and Hajarian [18] proposed two algorithms for solving the generalized coupled Sylvester matrix equations over reflexive and anti-reflexive matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%