2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10260-019-00498-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized mixture integer-valued GARCH model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2021) (with value 1.13) and Mao et al . (2020) (with value 1.01) which are obtained form mixture (Poisson) INARCH model and mixture (negative binomial) INGARCH model respectively. For completeness, we also considered the Ecoli series without the two first observations as considered by Doukhan et al .…”
Section: Empirical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2021) (with value 1.13) and Mao et al . (2020) (with value 1.01) which are obtained form mixture (Poisson) INARCH model and mixture (negative binomial) INGARCH model respectively. For completeness, we also considered the Ecoli series without the two first observations as considered by Doukhan et al .…”
Section: Empirical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the out‐of‐sample forecasting ability of the MthINGARCH(1,1) is assessed for the Ecoli series. Because of the unavailability of the estimation codes for the Poisson mixture INARCH (Doukhan et al ., 2021) and the Negative binomial mixture INGARCH (Mao et al ., 2020) models, we only compare our MthINGARCH(1,1) model with two standard models, namely the P‐INGARCH(1,1) model Yt|t1Y𝒫χtwithχt=c0+a0Yt1+b0χt1 and the NB‐INGARCH(1,1) model Yt|t1Y𝒩r0,r0r0+χtwithχt=c0+a0Yt1+b0χt1. We, therefore, estimate the three models using the first nc observations of the series, where 1<n…”
Section: Empirical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We consider the following first‐order mixture double autoregressive (MDAR(1) model with two components yt={left leftarraya1yt1+εtb0(1)+b1(1)yt12,with probabilityarrayp,arraya2yt1+εtb0(2)+b1(2)yt12,with probabilityarray1p,$$ {y}_t=\left\{\begin{array}{ll}{a}_1{y}_{t-1}+{\varepsilon}_t\sqrt{b_0^{(1)}+{b}_1^{(1)}{y}_{t-1}^2},\mathrm{with}\ \mathrm{probability}& \kern0.60em p,\\ {}{a}_2{y}_{t-1}+{\varepsilon}_t\sqrt{b_0^{(2)}+{b}_1^{(2)}{y}_{t-1}^2},\mathrm{with}\ \mathrm{probability}& 1-p,\end{array}\right. $$ where yt$$ {y}_t $$ is the observation, biprefix−1false(jfalse)>0$$ {b}_{i-1}^{(j)}>0 $$, i,jfalse{1,2false}$$ i,j\in \left\{1,2\right\} $$, p$$ p $$ is the mixture probability, which is assumed to be taken values in (0.5,1) for identifiability (see Mao, Zhu, & Cui, 2020; Zhu, Li, & Wang, 2010 for related discussions). εt…”
Section: The Mdar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i−1 > 0, i, j ∈ {1, 2}, p is the mixture probability, which is assumed to be taken values in (0.5,1) for identifiability (see Mao, Zhu, & Cui, 2020;Zhu, Li, & Wang, 2010 for related discussions). 𝜀 t is the i.i.d.…”
Section: The Mdar Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More extensive and complex GARCH models were developed to improve the forecasting model. For example, a fuzzy GJR-GARCH model using fuzzy inference systems [22], hybrid neural network GJR-GARCH models [23,24] for volatility forecasting of indexes, a mixture of integer-valued models with different distributions in GARCH model [25], and a hidden Markov Exponential GARCH model for volatility forecasting of crude oil price [26]. Another approach toward improving the GARCH model was introduced by using a sliding window technique to forecast future values in various fields; this was called the sliding window GARCH (SWGARCH) model [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%