2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11081-020-09504-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized methodology for multidisciplinary design optimization using surrogate modelling and multifidelity analysis

Abstract: The advantages of multidisciplinary design are well understood, but not yet fully adopted by the industry where methods should be both fast and reliable. For such problems, minimum computational cost while providing global optimality and extensive design information at an early conceptual stage is desired. However, such a complex problem consisting of various objectives and interacting disciplines is associated with a challenging design space. This provides a large pool of possible designs, requiring an effici… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A nonwell defined design space runs the risk of including physically and/or geometrically unnecessary search regions, wasting search time (Sóbester and Powell 2013). A large pool of possible designs need an efficient exploration scheme to provide sufficient feedback (Kontogiannis and Savill 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nonwell defined design space runs the risk of including physically and/or geometrically unnecessary search regions, wasting search time (Sóbester and Powell 2013). A large pool of possible designs need an efficient exploration scheme to provide sufficient feedback (Kontogiannis and Savill 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The algorithm can find a diverse set of solutions by using a concept called "crowding distance" to measure the diversity of solutions in the population and ensure that a wide range of solutions is explored. As a result, MOPSO can identify the non-dominated solutions in the set and generate the Pareto front [31][32][33].…”
Section: Figure 3 Teardown Studies and Detailed Component Explanation...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then different criteria are used to better resolve the Pareto front approximation and choose the solver fidelity for each iteration [38][39][40]. Similarly, Kontogiannis et al [41] used the Expected Improvement (EI) of each objective to find a non-dominated front of EIs with the help of a population-based multi-objective algorithm. The approach is similar to the one proposed by Jeong S. et al [42] for multi-objective EGO, but it further chooses the solver's fidelity by evaluating the multi-fidelity metamodel error prediction.…”
Section: Multi-fidelity Multi-objective Acquisition Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%