2018
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2018.2872856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli Filter With Object Spawning

Abstract: Previous labeled random finite set filter developments use a motion model that only accounts for survival and birth. While such a model provides the means for a multi-object tracking filter such as the Generalized Labeled Multi-Bernoulli (GLMB) filter to capture object births and deaths in a wide variety of applications, it lacks the capability to capture spawned tracks and their lineages. In this paper, we propose a new GLMB based filter that formally incorporates spawning, in addition to birth. This formulat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We chose a resolution of 768 × 1024 × 21 resulting in approximately 0.08m×0.08m×0.19m per cell. Each voxel, where at least one point exists inside its 3D space and is visible to the front camera, is filled with a normalized class value extracted from the semantic map in range [1,2]. Therefore, we project all relevant points into the image using calibrations from [8] and argmax over the frequency of all resolved classes.…”
Section: Point Cloud Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose a resolution of 768 × 1024 × 21 resulting in approximately 0.08m×0.08m×0.19m per cell. Each voxel, where at least one point exists inside its 3D space and is visible to the front camera, is filled with a normalized class value extracted from the semantic map in range [1,2]. Therefore, we project all relevant points into the image using calibrations from [8] and argmax over the frequency of all resolved classes.…”
Section: Point Cloud Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Different from the δ-GLMB spawning model of the point target in reference [30], neither states of the split subgroups are identical with the expected value of its parent in this paper. That is to say, the split subgroups and its parent are mutually exclusive; e.g., when the formation of the UAV cluster is split into two subgroups, the group extension and measurement rate are greatly changed.…”
Section: Ggiw-δ-glmb Prediction and Update With Splittingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Consider the splitting model in references [18,30], we make the following assumptions: A1: The group target splits at the prediction phase. A2: Let the dimension of the extension state be d. As the split may happen in any dimension, if a parent track with label l ∈ L at time k splits 2 subgroups (split pair) at time k + 1, then, each subgroup takes on the label l T,i,j = l, k + 1, i, j , while i = 1, … , d, j = 1, 2, and the parameter i is the same for the split pair.…”
Section: Ggiw-δ-glmb Prediction and Update With Splittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…GLMB filtering has been demonstrated to track more than one million targets in heavy clutter, misdetections and data association uncertainty [37]. Another advantage of labeled RFS over unlabeled RFS is that it can provide ancestry or lineage information in problems that involve spawning targets [38]. Such capability is not possible without labels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%