2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2015.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalized Finite Element Method for hydro-mechanically coupled analysis of hydraulic fracturing problems using space-time variant enrichment functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When using XFEM for fluid infiltrated medium, a proper enrichment needs to be implemented to reproduce the pore-pressure variation in the solid matrix associated with the fracture (discontinuity in the pressure gradient normal to the fracture). Different schemes have been proposed (Mohammadnejad and Khoei, 2013a;Faivre et al, 2016;Meschke and Leonhart, 2015). The lack of consistent benchmarking and convergence studies renders the discussion on the efficiency and robustness of these different schemes rather difficult.…”
Section: Extended / Generalized Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using XFEM for fluid infiltrated medium, a proper enrichment needs to be implemented to reproduce the pore-pressure variation in the solid matrix associated with the fracture (discontinuity in the pressure gradient normal to the fracture). Different schemes have been proposed (Mohammadnejad and Khoei, 2013a;Faivre et al, 2016;Meschke and Leonhart, 2015). The lack of consistent benchmarking and convergence studies renders the discussion on the efficiency and robustness of these different schemes rather difficult.…”
Section: Extended / Generalized Finite Element Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, it is at least C 0 continuous (Luege et al, ; Prévost & Sukumar, ). Nonetheless, a jump in the fluid normal velocity v n (pressure normal gradient) and a spike in the fluid tangential velocity v τ (pressure tangential gradient) across a fracture, are allowed (Meschke & Leonhart, ) (see Figure ). In Ω asy , the above statement is summarized as []||p(),xtrue¯t=0,0.7em[]||truev¯(),xtrue¯tntrue¯fitrue0¯,0.4emtruex¯fi,i=1~nf …”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wish to model changes in field variables under homogeneous boundary conditions. In Ω asy , standard Dirchlet and Neumann boundary conditions are prescribed on ∂Ω for both the fluid problem and the solid problem (see, e.g., Meschke & Leonhart, ): p()xtrue¯=pg0.4emtruex¯Ωp truen¯truev¯()xtrue¯=vh0.6emtruex¯Ωv trueu¯()xtrue¯=utrue¯g1emtruex¯Ωu truen¯boldσ()xtrue¯=ttrue¯h()x0.6emtruex¯Ωt …”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mohammadnejad and Khoei [15] carried out the extended finite element modeling of cohesive crack propagation in multiphase porous media, and they [16]subsequently proposed a fully coupled numerical model for the modeling of the hydraulic fracture propagation in porous media using the extended finite element method in conjunction with the cohesive crack model. Meschke and Leonhart [17] presented a numerical model to simulate the hydraulic fracture propagation based on the extended finite element method, in this model the enrichment functions are space and time variant. Although the above model not need to introduce leak-off coefficient to describe the fluid leak-off phenomenon, they are all assume that the fracture along the straight line extension.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%