1995
DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(95)00890-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalized Finite Element Method for solving the Helmholtz equation in two dimensions with minimal pollution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
268
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(295 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
268
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is known [33] that, for κh=constant, the errors of the finite element solutions deteriorate rapidly as the wavenumber κ increases. This nonrobust behaviour with respect to κ is known as the pollution effect [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. The pollution effect may be reduced by increasing the order of the elements in the finite element method or using a small enough mesh for the resolution.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is known [33] that, for κh=constant, the errors of the finite element solutions deteriorate rapidly as the wavenumber κ increases. This nonrobust behaviour with respect to κ is known as the pollution effect [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. The pollution effect may be reduced by increasing the order of the elements in the finite element method or using a small enough mesh for the resolution.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 demonstrates that for the specific choice δ PML = 10 −6 , so that kδ PML ∈ I opt (and a single element in the PML region, N PML = 1) the L 2 error behaves like E ∼ N −(p+1) (for p = 1, 2 and 3) as N is increased, indicating that the error is completely controlled by the discretisation of the bulk mesh. We refer to [32,33,34] for a discussion of the optimal convergence rate of numerical solutions obtained from finite element discretisations of the Helmholtz equation and note that the observed convergence rate indicates that the bulk discretisation was always sufficiently fine to avoid dispersion errors. …”
Section: Test Case 1: a One-dimensional Waveguidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although significant progress in the understanding of the behavior of numerical methods for Helmholtz problems has been made in the past, a general, full analysis that is explicit in the wave number k and discretization parameters is still not available. Partial results such as sharp estimates for the inf-sup constant of the continuous equations, lower estimates for the convergence rates, one-dimensional analysis by using the discrete Green's function as well as a dispersion analysis for finite element discretizations and generalizations thereof have been derived by many researchers in the past decades (see, e.g., [2,4,6,7,9,10,11,15,17,18,19,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,33,38,43,44]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%