2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.specom.2007.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized estimation approach for linear and nonlinear microphone array post-filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the focus of our evaluation is the CDR estimation, we apply the suppression simply to the first microphone signal. Alternatives would be to average the power spectra between microphones [4], or to use beamforming to combine the signals, which would however change the CDR and therefore require consideration in the suppression filter computation [19]. • .…”
Section: Cdr-based Dereverberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the focus of our evaluation is the CDR estimation, we apply the suppression simply to the first microphone signal. Alternatives would be to average the power spectra between microphones [4], or to use beamforming to combine the signals, which would however change the CDR and therefore require consideration in the suppression filter computation [19]. • .…”
Section: Cdr-based Dereverberationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MVDR beamformer weights and the post-filter transfer function for each of the MMSE, STSA and log-STSA post-filters are estimated using the estimation procedure proposed in [14].…”
Section: A Multichannel Speech Enhancement Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both methods overestimate the noise power spectral density at the beamformer's output and, thus, they are suboptimal in the Wiener sense (Simmer & Wasiljeff, 1992). In (Lefkimmiatis & Maragos, 2007), the authors have obtained a more accurate estimation of the noise power spectral density at the output of the beamformer proposed in (Simmer & Wasiljeff, 1992) by taking into account the noise reduction performed by the minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamformer.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%