2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized DCT compression based density method for topology optimization of 2D and 3D continua

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After this, 3D DCT can be seen, which is achieved by changing the dimension of sequence. Now, a sequence is given in spatial domain, which needs to be processed by [ 43 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After this, 3D DCT can be seen, which is achieved by changing the dimension of sequence. Now, a sequence is given in spatial domain, which needs to be processed by [ 43 ]: …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compact form of 3D DCT can be directly derived by generalizing Equation (7) [ 43 ], taking into consideration the separability property of DCT. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, White et al proposed a novel method to represent the density field with a truncated Fourier representation, where the number of decision variables is reduced significantly. Du et al proposed a novel efficient topology optimization based on image compression techniques, where the number of design variables can be phenomenally reduced. In fact, geometry projection methods and Fourier representation can be classified into dimension reduction method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique can also be used for optimizing the topology of 3D structures with a significantly small number of design variables 9 . Also with the aiming of reducing the number of design variables, inspired by the idea of image compression, Zhou et al 10 proposed a novel approach based on discrete cosine transform and density interpolation. Considering the fact that the dominant part of computational cost is usually spent on the response analysis of a 3D topology optimization problem, many works have been devoted to saving the time involved in structural analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%