1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf01396750
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalized conjugate gradient, least square method

Abstract: Summary. A generalized s-term truncated conjugate gradient method of least square type, proposed in [1 a, b], is extended to a form more suitable for proving when the truncated version is identical to the full-term version. Advantages with keeping a control term in the truncated version is pointed out. A computationally efficient new algorithm, based on a special inner product with a small demand of storage is also presented.We also give simplified and slightly extended proofs of termination of the iterative s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
120
0
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
120
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The same result is obtained in [5] and in [1] by Axelsson (under a more generally formulation). We also note that no particular relation on p is found when A is nondiagonalizable.…”
Section: Proposition 33supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same result is obtained in [5] and in [1] by Axelsson (under a more generally formulation). We also note that no particular relation on p is found when A is nondiagonalizable.…”
Section: Proposition 33supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Several authors have already tried to analyse the effects of a singular matrix on a Krylov subspace method and we give below a list of their works. We remind that Brown and Walker have introduced in [3] conditions concerning the singular matrix A under which the GMRES iterates converge safely to a solution of (1) and remark that these theoretical results are still true for any mathematically equivalent method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The similar and more general estimates can be found in the papers [5], [6], [7], [8]. These authors formulate their estimates in the form r m 2 ≤ (1− (m)) r 0 2 and formulate sufficient conditions for (m) to be in the interval 0 < (m) ≤ < 1 for all m. In this sense we will generalize first all known results in the following.…”
Section: The Recapitulation Of Various Bounds For R Msupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Conjugate gradient m ethods have become one of the most widespread ways of solving not only symmetric but also nonsymmetric linear algebraic systems [2,4]. An early paper dealing w ith generalized conjugate gradient m ethods for nonsymmetric systems is [3], and a survey of available m ethods can be found in [14], which includes also the popular GMRES m ethod [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%