1977
DOI: 10.1080/00036817708839144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalization, to Higher Dimensions, of a Theorem of Lucas Concerning the Zeros of the Derivative of a Polvnomial of one Complex Variable

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we remark that since all the charges are positive, it is a direct consequence of the generalized Lucas theorem, proved in [3] (see also [6]), that all the critical points lie in a convex hall of the point charges. Therefore, it is clear that an equilibrium position r (n, β) cannot exceed (the length of) an apothem of a regular polygon, for all non-negative β and all n ≥ 3.…”
Section: Asymptotic Behavior Of Critical Pointsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First, we remark that since all the charges are positive, it is a direct consequence of the generalized Lucas theorem, proved in [3] (see also [6]), that all the critical points lie in a convex hall of the point charges. Therefore, it is clear that an equilibrium position r (n, β) cannot exceed (the length of) an apothem of a regular polygon, for all non-negative β and all n ≥ 3.…”
Section: Asymptotic Behavior Of Critical Pointsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some further generalizations of the Gauss-Lucas theorem to higher dimensions can be found in [27], also cf. [20]. However, it turns out that for atomic measures µ even the estimate for the total number of critical points where the gradient of the potential vanishes, i.e., no force is present, is not known.…”
Section: Maxwell's Conjecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…, x") where the coordinates are real numbers. Recently, Diaz and Shaffer [1] found an interesting extension which we now describe. In their work they use the symbol w = (wx,w2, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%