Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10955-007-9376-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalization of the Stillinger–Lovett Sum Rules for the Two-Dimensional Jellium

Abstract: In the equilibrium statistical mechanics of classical Coulomb fluids, the long-range tail of the Coulomb potential gives rise to the StillingerLovett sum rules for the charge correlation functions. For the jellium model of mobile particles of charge q immersed in a neutralizing background, the fixing of one of the q-charges induces a screening cloud of the charge density whose zeroth and second moments are determined just by the Stillinger-Lovett sum rules. In this paper, we generalize these sum rules to the s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we get the zeroth moment 19) in agreement with equation (1.20) in [1], and the part linear in Z of the second moment (2.1). It may be remarked that the k 4 term of (2.18) is related to the compressibility, which is exactly known only for the 2D OCP [5].…”
Section: Another Derivationsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we get the zeroth moment 19) in agreement with equation (1.20) in [1], and the part linear in Z of the second moment (2.1). It may be remarked that the k 4 term of (2.18) is related to the compressibility, which is exactly known only for the 2D OCP [5].…”
Section: Another Derivationsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…One can obtain the last result in an alternative way by considering the charge density induced around the guest charge [1] ρ(r|Ze, 0) = −Ze κ 2 2π K 0 (κr). (4.12)…”
Section: High-temperature Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This result goes back to [1]. The second moment is more involved [3,29,30]. Curiously, the second moment vanishes at ν = 1 3 and a = 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%