2017
DOI: 10.1017/s0013091516000638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalization of the Eisenstein–Dumas–Schönemann Irreducibility Criterion

Abstract: In 2013, Weintraub gave a generalization of the classical Eisenstein irreducibility criterion in an attempt to correct a false claim made by Eisenstein. Using a different approach, we prove Weintraub's result with a weaker hypothesis in a more general setup that leads to an extension of the generalized Schönemann irreducibility criterion for polynomials with coefficients in arbitrary valued fields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the factorization results on polynomials over a discrete valuation domain (R, v) require to take v(a s ) and n − s to be coprime, whenever s is the smallest index for which the minimum of the quantity v(a i )/(n − i), 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 is v(a s )/(n − s) (See for example, Jhorar and Khanduja [6]). In the case when v(a s ) and n − s are not coprime, we have the following result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the factorization results on polynomials over a discrete valuation domain (R, v) require to take v(a s ) and n − s to be coprime, whenever s is the smallest index for which the minimum of the quantity v(a i )/(n − i), 0 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 is v(a s )/(n − s) (See for example, Jhorar and Khanduja [6]). In the case when v(a s ) and n − s are not coprime, we have the following result.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be pointed out that, in the above examples, the irreducibility of the polynomials f 5 (x) and g 4 (x) do not seem to follow from any known irreducibility criterion (cf. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] and [7]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%