1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01456407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalization of Kodaira-Ramanujam's vanishing theorem

Abstract: In this paper we shall generalize Ramanujam's form of Kodaira's vanishing theorem [4] in the higher dimensional case. Let X be a non-singular projective algebraic variety defined over the complex number field. A divisor D on X is said to be numerically effective (or semi-positive), if the intersection number (D-C) is non-negative for any curve C on X. The main result in this paper is the following:Theorem 1. Let D be a numerically effective divisor on X. Assume that the highest self-intersection number (D") is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
167
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 302 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
167
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, we get the following important vanishing theorem, which can be seen as a generalization of the Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing theorem (see [Kaw82], [Vie82], [EV86]). …”
Section: Hörmander's L 2 Estimates and Existence Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, we get the following important vanishing theorem, which can be seen as a generalization of the Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing theorem (see [Kaw82], [Vie82], [EV86]). …”
Section: Hörmander's L 2 Estimates and Existence Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ramanujam [51] (in whose paper the method of coverings already appears), Y. Miyaoka [45] (the first who works with integral parts of Q l divisors, in the surface case), by Y. Kawamata [36] and the second author [63]. All results mentioned replace the condition "ample" in Kodaira's result by weaker conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if a defines a smooth subvariety of codimension d, then J (X, a m ) = a m−d . The proof Ein and Lazarsfeld's result heavily uses the Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing theorem [Kaw82,Vie82]. Another way to interpret the subspace…”
Section: Theorem C (Effective Computation Of Test Ideals Theorem 54)mentioning
confidence: 99%