2005
DOI: 10.1109/tsa.2004.838775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalization of blind source separation algorithms for convolutive mixtures based on second-order statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
176
0
9

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
176
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, we see that the disjointness maximization algorithm (10) is better than the amplitude-modulation decorrelation algorithm given in (15). Secondly, the results in Table I show that the new approach (10) performs better than the methods in [7] and [8], and slightly better than the one in [13].…”
Section: A Simulation Results For the New Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Firstly, we see that the disjointness maximization algorithm (10) is better than the amplitude-modulation decorrelation algorithm given in (15). Secondly, the results in Table I show that the new approach (10) performs better than the methods in [7] and [8], and slightly better than the one in [13].…”
Section: A Simulation Results For the New Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In accordance with the frequency-domain integrated objective function in [13] and similar second-order statistics-based approaches found in [14] and [15], we define the following frequency-domain integrated objective function that will be optimized according to the time-domain parameters of the separation system: (9) where . The operator diag[.]…”
Section: Bss Based On the Maximization Of Disjointness Of Subbanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Localization and separation results are compared to the state-of-the-art EM-based sound source separation and localization algorithm MESSL [14] in table 1. The version MESSL-G used includes a garbage component and ILD priors to better account for reverberations and is reported to outperform four methods in reverberant conditions in terms of separation [3,16,4,17]. Note that this algorithm, as well as the vast majority of existing source localization methods [3,4,5,7,9,10], do not make use a training set 2D source locations and hence they only provide time difference of arrival for each source, i.e., frontal azimuth and no elevation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convolutive ICA models have traditionally been in use to perform blind separation of acoustically recorded signals into individual sources (e.g., several speakers, or speaker and noise source, [17,2,8]). The convolutive mixing model comes into play through room acoustics, where the signal of each speaker has to be convolved with the room's impulse response from the speaker to each of the microphones to obtain the signal at each microphone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%