1967
DOI: 10.1017/s0305004100041736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalization of a boundedness theorem for a certain third-order differential equation

Abstract: 1. This paper investigates the boundedness, as t → ∞, of the solutions of the real differential equationwhere α is a constant and φ2, φ3, ψ depend on the arguments shown with φ2, φ′3, ψ continuous.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematical studies of third-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations include those of Tunç [10] who proved the stability and boundedness of solutions of nonlinear vector differential equations by means of Lyapunov's second method, Ezeilo [11][12][13], Rao [14], Reissig et al [15], Tunç and Ateş [16], etc. On the other hand, mathematical modelling of several physical phenomena sometimes result in third-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mathematical studies of third-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations include those of Tunç [10] who proved the stability and boundedness of solutions of nonlinear vector differential equations by means of Lyapunov's second method, Ezeilo [11][12][13], Rao [14], Reissig et al [15], Tunç and Ateş [16], etc. On the other hand, mathematical modelling of several physical phenomena sometimes result in third-order nonlinear ordinary differential equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I n this paper, conditions obtained using a complete Yoshizawa functions (according to Chukwu [5] ) are exact, see for instance [5] , [10] , and [13] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever n and n the hypotheses and conclusion of theorem coincide with those of Chukwu [5] , except hypotheses (i) and (iii) of the theorem which are considerable weaker than those in [5] Remark 2: If n˜ n ™ and n then (1) reduces to the case studied by Ezeilo [10] .…”
Section: Proof Of the Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations