2000
DOI: 10.1006/jmaa.2000.7094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalization for Fourier Transforms of a Theorem due to Marcinkiewicz

Abstract: It is shown that the maximal operator of the Marcinkiewicz means of a temperedŽ . quently, is of weak type 1, 1 , where p -1. As a consequence we obtain a 0 generalization for Fourier transforms of a summability result due to Marcinkiewicz Ž 2 . and Zhizhiashvili, more exactly, the Marcinkiewicz means of a function f g L R 1 converge a.e. to the function in question. Moreover, we prove that the Ž 2 . Marcinkiewicz means are uniformly bounded on the spaces H R and so they

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , (19) different from zero. If say, (n + k) a = 0 for some t 1 + i + m < a < l, then as k t 1 +i+m changes from 0 to 1, we do not have change in (n + k) l and in ω (n+k) (t 2 +1) (x 2 ) and consequently (19) is zero.…”
Section: We Use the Notationmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…. , (19) different from zero. If say, (n + k) a = 0 for some t 1 + i + m < a < l, then as k t 1 +i+m changes from 0 to 1, we do not have change in (n + k) l and in ω (n+k) (t 2 +1) (x 2 ) and consequently (19) is zero.…”
Section: We Use the Notationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…, (n + k) t 2 should be 1 for each k i (0 ≤ i ≤ t 2 , i = t 1 + i + m, l + j) for those addends in (19) different from zero. If say, (n + k) a = 0 for some t 1 + i + m < a < l, then as k t 1 +i+m changes from 0 to 1, we do not have change in (n + k) l and in ω (n+k) (t 2 +1) (x 2 ) and consequently (19) is zero. That is, the number is the tuples (k 0 , .…”
Section: More Lemmas and Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Dyachenko [3] proved this result for dimensions greater than 2. In 2001, Weisz [12] proved this result with respect to the Walsh-Paley system. Goginava [6] proved the corresponding result for the d-dimensional Walsh-Paley system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%