2023
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acf3cd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A generalizable new figure of merit for dose optimization in dual energy cone beam CT scanning protocols

Chenguang Li,
Li Zhou,
Jun Deng
et al.

Abstract: Objective: This study proposes and evaluates a new figure of merit (FOMn) for dose¬ optimization of Dual-energy CBCT (DE-CBCT) scanning protocols based on size-dependent modeling of radiation dose and multi-scale image quality.
Approach: FOMn was defined using Z-score normalization and was proportional to the dose efficiency providing better multi-scale image quality, including comprehensive contrast-to-noise ratio (CCNR) and electron density (CED) for CatPhan604 inserts of various materials. Acrylic a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimizing the VM image creation process with respect to imaging dose and mAs settings remains a significant avenue for exploration. 33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing the VM image creation process with respect to imaging dose and mAs settings remains a significant avenue for exploration. 33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phantom imaging studies were performed using the same x-ray exposure (mAs) for the two beams. Due to the differences in x-ray attenuation from the filters and the object, the post-object dose rate of the HE beam was about 70% of that of the LE beam, resulting in a higher noise level for the HE images, which may not be ideal for the overall image quality 35 . With two independently controlled cathodes and focal spots, the X-ray exposure and the dose rate of the two beams from the dual-focus x-ray source can be readily modulated in this system, as demonstrated in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%