Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Confere 2015
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-1028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Generalisation of Lexical Functions for Composition in Distributional Semantics

Abstract: Over the last two decades, numerous algorithms have been developed that successfully capture something of the semantics of single words by looking at their distribution in text and comparing these distributions in a vector space model. However, it is not straightforward to construct meaning representations beyond the level of individual words -i.e. the combination of words into larger units -using distributional methods. Our contribution is twofold. First of all, we carry out a largescale evaluation, comparing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we provide results for a pilot study as to whether the two distributional approaches described earlier reflect a semantic shift in co-composition for adjectives and nouns and can offer something like a justification, in terms of related words, of an expression's use in context. Our evaluation used a list of English adjective-noun combinations drawn from Wiktionary, extracted by the method discussed in Bride, Van de Cruys, and Asher (2015). We added to this list adjective-noun combinations that we thought would exhibit more interesting co-compositional interaction, to achieve a list of 246 adjective-noun pairs in total (see Appendix A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we provide results for a pilot study as to whether the two distributional approaches described earlier reflect a semantic shift in co-composition for adjectives and nouns and can offer something like a justification, in terms of related words, of an expression's use in context. Our evaluation used a list of English adjective-noun combinations drawn from Wiktionary, extracted by the method discussed in Bride, Van de Cruys, and Asher (2015). We added to this list adjective-noun combinations that we thought would exhibit more interesting co-compositional interaction, to achieve a list of 246 adjective-noun pairs in total (see Appendix A).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More precisely, we investigate the hypothesis that a full additive model captures a generalized compositional process in the semantics of attributedenoting adjective-noun phrases rather than the lexical meaning of individual attributes (cf. Bride et al (2015)). …”
Section: Experiments 2: Generalization Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Widdows (2008), Grefenstette and Sadrzadeh (2011), Grefenstette et al (2014)). Bride et al (2015) observe that such composition operators, by being trained on empirical corpus data, can either be tailored to specific lexical types (i.e., individual composition functions for each adjective in the corpus), or designed to capture general compositional processes in syntactic configurations (i.e., a single lexical function for all adjective-noun phrases). In line with these authors, we aim at learning a lexical function which captures attribute meaning in the compositional semantics of adjective-noun phrases, while generalizing over individual attributes.…”
Section: Compositionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations