2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general variational framework considering cast shadows for the topographic correction of remote sensing imagery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because the study area is dominated by coniferous forests that have homogeneous canopy structures. The LPE-SEC model, as a statistical method based on mean approximation, can generate more accurate results than the other models [28]. The LPE-MIN method has the poorest correction accuracy, which is consistent with the findings of [28] that claimed larger solar elevation angles might bring better performances.…”
Section: Comparison Between Traditional Tc Models and Tc Models Consisupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is because the study area is dominated by coniferous forests that have homogeneous canopy structures. The LPE-SEC model, as a statistical method based on mean approximation, can generate more accurate results than the other models [28]. The LPE-MIN method has the poorest correction accuracy, which is consistent with the findings of [28] that claimed larger solar elevation angles might bring better performances.…”
Section: Comparison Between Traditional Tc Models and Tc Models Consisupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The LPE-SEC model, as a statistical method based on mean approximation, can generate more accurate results than the other models [28]. The LPE-MIN method has the poorest correction accuracy, which is consistent with the findings of [28] that claimed larger solar elevation angles might bring better performances. However, some researchers suggested that the poor results from the solar elevation angle smaller than 25 • [28] should be attributed to the different image acquisition times (such as in August and December).…”
Section: Comparison Between Traditional Tc Models and Tc Models Consisupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, commonly applied topographic-correction methods do not provide a fully comprehensive ARC solution. Topographic-correction approaches can be organized into three categories: spectral-feature extraction methods, empirical modeling, and radiation-transfer modeling [49][50][51]. Empirical methods can be divided into those based on a Lambertian assumption of surface reflectance and those based on a non-Lambertian assumption.…”
Section: Arcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of authors have indicated the superior performance of the SEC when comparing topographic-correction algorithms, e.g., [59][60][61][62]. As with other topographic correction methods reported in the literature, different algorithms have been used to represent the SEC, e.g., [13,51,63].…”
Section: Empirical Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%