2009
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1080.0367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Theory of Organizational Stigma

Abstract: We thank Senior Editor Sim Sitkin and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions. We also gratefully acknowledge helpful suggestions from Adrienne Colella,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
420
1
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(449 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
5
420
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In sociology, social status describes a social rank or a position in a hierarchical order and thus refers to the relative standing of an individual or organisation in the society (Devers et al 2009). In accordance with this concept, a number of studies analyse the social status of individuals with a specific occupation.…”
Section: Measuring the Social Status Of Education Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In sociology, social status describes a social rank or a position in a hierarchical order and thus refers to the relative standing of an individual or organisation in the society (Devers et al 2009). In accordance with this concept, a number of studies analyse the social status of individuals with a specific occupation.…”
Section: Measuring the Social Status Of Education Programmesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a successful functioning of a dual VET system 2 depends on the social status of this education programme (Lasonen and Manning 2001;Cedefop 2014), whereat social status refers to the relative position or rank of that programme compared to other education programmes on the same educational level (Devers et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le concept d'illégitimité organisationnelle a fait l'objet de moins de travaux et se trouve de fait moins bien défini (Devers, et al 2009). Par ailleurs, le lien théorique avec la légitimité organisationnelle reste à établir (Hudson, 2008).…”
Section: -Définitionsunclassified
“…Les organisations légitimes sont celles dont les valeurs et les comportements sont les plus en phase avec les conventions sociales, ce qui leur permet d'acquérir des ressources plus facilement (Deephouse et Suchman, 1995). Moins connue est la notion d' « illégitimité » organisationnelle, lorsque les organisations violent les normes sociales (Hudson, 2008 ;Devers et al 2009). Un des défis théoriques que présente cette littérature est le fait que certaines organisations peuvent simultanément être légitimes et illégitimes (Hudson, 2008), comme le suggère la survivance d'organisations hautement illégitimes, par exemple dans les industries comme le tabac ou le jeu (Galvin, et al 2004).…”
unclassified
“…rganizational stigma is a nascent and bourgeoning field of research in organization and work-life studies (Carberry and King 2012;Devers et al 2009;Hudson 2008;Mishina and Devers 2012;Vergne 2012). Asserting the construct, organizational stigma has been set against and separated from other related concepts in organization theory, such as organizational status (Devers et al 2009), organizational misconduct (Pozner 2008), and organizational reputation (Devers et al 2009;Mishina and Devers 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%