1967
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/9.4.373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Theory of Classificatory Sorting Strategies: 1. Hierarchical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
607
0
20

Year Published

1977
1977
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,443 publications
(630 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
607
0
20
Order By: Relevance
“…An interesting updating scheme for dissimilarities in agglomerative hierarchical clustering has been proposed in [87] and extended in [79,80]. A parametric formula gives new dissimilarity values between cluster C k and C i , C j when these last two are merged:…”
Section: Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting updating scheme for dissimilarities in agglomerative hierarchical clustering has been proposed in [87] and extended in [79,80]. A parametric formula gives new dissimilarity values between cluster C k and C i , C j when these last two are merged:…”
Section: Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that significant levels of individual diet specialization were detected at each site, we used Hierarchical Cluster Analysis to classify otters into groups of animals having similar diet specializations, following previously-published methods (Tinker 2004. For this analysis we treated individual sea otters from both sites as experimental units, key prey types (those prey types comprising over 5% of diets overall) as variables, Euclidean distances were used as diet similarity measures, and clusters were identified using the Lance-Williams "flex beta" clustering algorithm with beta = -.25 (Lance andWilliams 1967, Scheibler andSchneider 1985). We selected the optimal number of clusters based on profile plots of Root mean square standard deviation (RMSSTD) and the pseudo-F value (the optimal number of clusters is expected to produce a local minima of the RMSSTD and a maximal value of the pseudo-F value).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They generate a classification in a bottom-up manner, by a series of agglomerations in which small clusters, initially containing individual molecules, are fused together to form progressively larger clusters, with the most similar pair of clusters being fused at each stage of the classification. The various hierarchic agglomerative methods differ only in the criterion that is used to select the most similar pair of clusters at each stage; indeed, they can all be implemented using a common algorithm first described in detail by Lance and Williams [20] (although more efficient algorithms are available for individual clustering methods [21]). …”
Section: The Székely-rizzo Clustering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%