1969
DOI: 10.1107/s0567739469000490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general theory for the diffraction line profiles of h.c.p. and f.c.c. polycrystals containing stacking faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The X-ray diffraction theory from 2H crystals with random deformation SFs was first considered by CHRISTIAN (1954). A general theory for 2H and 3C structures containing growth, extended growth and deformation faults was given by SATO (1969). LALE at al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The X-ray diffraction theory from 2H crystals with random deformation SFs was first considered by CHRISTIAN (1954). A general theory for 2H and 3C structures containing growth, extended growth and deformation faults was given by SATO (1969). LALE at al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice it is often necessary to analyse the polytypic structure of polycrystalline materials. There are many papers concerned with this subject, in which the main problem in structure analysis is the determination of probability parameters for the appearance of respective layer sequences (Warren, 1959;Sato, 1969;Farkas-Jahnke, 1973a,b;etc.). In this paper the possibility of applying the model method to analysis of X-ray powder patterns is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the practical importance of materials with structures built up of translationally equivalent layers, several theories and methods have been worked out since the early days of X-ray diffraction methods to make possible the characterization of their faulted structures (Warren, 1941;Hendricks & Teller, 1942;Gevers, 1952Gevers, , 1954Kakinoki & Komura, 1952;Paterson, 1952;Johnson, 1963;Allegra, 1964;Sato, 1966Sato, , 1969Kakinoki, 1967;Lele, Anantharaman & Johnson, 1967;Holloway, 1969;Lele, 1969;Lele, Prasad & Anantharaman, 1969;Lele & Rama Rao, 1970;Prasad & Lele, 1971). These methods, however, are all indirect, assuming random distribution of stacking faults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%