1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.2164-4918.1984.tb00261.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Structural Model for Primary Prevention Program Development in Mental Health

Abstract: A five‐step structural model for primary prevention program development work in mental health is proposed. Each step is defined and illustrated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The intervention programme not only affected already existing victimization problems, it also reduced considerably the number (and percentage) of new victims (O/weus, 1992a). The programme had thus both primary and secondary prevention effects (Cowen, 1984).…”
Section: Effects Of a School Based Intervention Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention programme not only affected already existing victimization problems, it also reduced considerably the number (and percentage) of new victims (O/weus, 1992a). The programme had thus both primary and secondary prevention effects (Cowen, 1984).…”
Section: Effects Of a School Based Intervention Programmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intervention program not only affected already existing victimization problems; it also reduced considerably the number (and percentage) of new victims (Olweus, 1992a). The program had thus both primary and secondary prevention effects (Cowen, 1984).…”
Section: Effeci's Of a School Based Intervention Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, it helps explain the inconsistent and "weak" relationships between SPS skill acquisition and adjustment in previous studies. Secondly, it demonstrates the existence of "linkage" (Cowen, 1984) albeit in a more complicated manner than a simple correlation of change scores. Thirdly, it provides rational support for investigating the role of other moderator variables in skill-enhancement primary prevention programs (Durlak, 1983;Weissberg et al, 1981b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They postulate that other skills or affective components may be critical to trigger the application of the skills learned. Furthermore, reviewers consistently call for more sophistication in the evaluation of SPS programs (Cowen, 1984;Durlak, 1983). The failure of previous studies to demonstrate relationships between measures of SPS and adjustment may be due, in part, to the fact that a measurement of cognitive skills alone is not a complete or satisfactory assessment of the degree to which SPS skills are employed in latency-aged child's day-to-day activities (regardless of whether the measure is of quality or quantity of solution).…”
Section: Two Classrooms Of Fourth Grade Suburban Children (N = 37) Wementioning
confidence: 99%