“…In addition, the linear relationship between the enantiomeric excess of catalyst 2d and product 5a [Scheme 2, Reaction(2)],a sw ell as the first-order rate dependency on the concentration of catalyst 2d [Scheme 2, Reaction (3)],s uggests that catalyst 2d functions as monomeric species. [17] With these mechanistic insights, we performed ac omputational study of the reactions to explain the observede nantioselectivity.W ith am odified DFT calculation method of related phosphoric acid-catalyzed enantioselective reactions, [18] four transition states were located for the addition of 4a to 3 catalyzed by 2d,a nd the calculated enantiomeric excess (97 %f or (S)) from the differential transition state energies (DDG°S -R = À1.76 kcal mol À1 )w as in good agreement with the observed enantiomeric excess (93 %f or (S); DDG°S -R = À1.40 kcal mol À1 ). [18] Based on the most energetically accessible transition state structure leading to (S)-5a ( Figure 2), it is assumedt hat the CÀH-p interaction between the 2p osition of 4a and the anthranyl substituent of 2d was an important factor to stabilize the transition state, because the shortest length between the carbon and hydrogen atoms (2.83 )i ss maller than the sum of their Vand er Waals radii (2.90 ).…”