2005
DOI: 10.1002/fld.1031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general optimal formulation for the dynamic Smagorinsky subgrid-scale stress model

Abstract: SUMMARYIn this paper, a general optimal formulation for the dynamic Smagorinsky subgrid-scale (SGS) stress model is reported. The Smagorinsky constitutive relation has been revisited from the perspective of functional variation and optimization. The local error density of the dynamic Smagorinsky SGS model has been minimized directly to determine the model coe cient C S . A su cient and necessary condition for optimizing the SGS model is obtained and an orthogonal condition (OC), which governs the instantaneous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can lead to an over-prediction of SGS dissipation if the model coefficient is restricted to be positive, while on the other hand, potential numerical instability due to excessive backscatter of the SGS turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) can occur if the model coefficient is allowed to be negative (Salvetti and Banerjee, 1995;Piomelli, 1993). A systematic analysis of the Smagorinsky constitutive relation and discussion of local optimization procedures for determination of the dynamic coefficient C S can be found in the recent study of Wang and Bergstrom (2005b).…”
Section: Numerical Methods and Sgs Stress Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can lead to an over-prediction of SGS dissipation if the model coefficient is restricted to be positive, while on the other hand, potential numerical instability due to excessive backscatter of the SGS turbulence kinetic energy (TKE) can occur if the model coefficient is allowed to be negative (Salvetti and Banerjee, 1995;Piomelli, 1993). A systematic analysis of the Smagorinsky constitutive relation and discussion of local optimization procedures for determination of the dynamic coefficient C S can be found in the recent study of Wang and Bergstrom (2005b).…”
Section: Numerical Methods and Sgs Stress Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, simulations based on the DM can be numerically unstable due to excessive backscatter of TKE from the subgrid to resolved scales if the model coefficient is not properly bounded [15]. The DM is difficult to be applied locally without plane averaging the model coefficient [13,14] for a plane channel flow; and on the other hand, localization of the DM often results in integral equations which are difficult and costly to solve [16]. Since the above mentioned deficiencies related to the DM stem from its over-simplified constitutive relation, improved dynamic SGS stress models often consider nonSmagorinsky type constitutive relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A local dynamic Smagorinsky (LDS) sub-grid model (Piomelli and Liu, 1995;Wang and Bergstrom, 2005) is programmed by utilizing the LES method. In contrast to the standard and average dynamic Smagorinsky (ADS) sub-grid model, the LDS sub-grid model can consider the instantaneous and local effects of the flow field, hence greatly improving the near-wall results (Ji et al, 2022).…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%