2014
DOI: 10.1080/03610926.2013.784990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Model of Random Variation

Abstract: A statistical distribution of a random variable is uniquely represented by its normalbased quantile function. For a symmetrical distribution it is S-shaped (for negative kurtosis) and inverted S-shaped (otherwise). As skewness departs from zero, the quantile function gradually transforms into a monotone convex function (positive skewness) or concave function (otherwise). Recently, a new general modeling platform has beenintroduced, response modeling methodology, which delivers good representation to monotone c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also shows in the small error (relative to the response). Approximated via RMM modeling, many other published models delivered similar patterns for the error plots (Shore, Benson‐Karhi et al …”
Section: Rmm Modeling Of Monotone Convex Ecological Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This also shows in the small error (relative to the response). Approximated via RMM modeling, many other published models delivered similar patterns for the error plots (Shore, Benson‐Karhi et al …”
Section: Rmm Modeling Of Monotone Convex Ecological Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…This also shows in the small error (relative to the response). Approximated via RMM modeling, many other published models delivered similar patterns for the error plots (Shore,9,31 Benson-Karhi et al 11 ). Furthermore, attempts to use other commonly applied models as general modeling platforms failed to deliver comparable goodness of approximation.…”
Section: Rmm Approximation For Published Ecological Modelsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…To examine further the validity of the “Random‐identity Paradigm”, as detailed earlier, we employ a third source in the form of a random sample of 27 theoretical distributions, used in Shore 12 . Details of this sample are given in Supplementary Material.…”
Section: How Random‐identity (Partial or Complete) Affects Shape Prop...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine further the validity of the "Random-identity Paradigm", as detailed earlier, we employ a third source in the form of a random sample of 27 theoretical distributions, used in Shore. 12 Details of this sample are given in Supplementary Material. We first delete from the set negatively-skewed distributions (we are reminded that only eight of the 126 surgery subcategories, as detailed in Shore, 1 had negative Sk estimates, all larger than −1, possibly reflecting sampling deviation from zero).…”
Section: Versus Skmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For variations on the g ‐and‐ h approach, see Rayner & MacGillivray , Fischer et al , and the many references therein. For other transformation forms applied to g = φ , see Shore .…”
Section: The Menu: Four (Or Five) Main Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%