2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00428-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general model for automated business diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We present a method that gives the OLAP analyst explanations for significant decreases or increases in business measures, identified at an aggregated level. Our method for automated diagnosis is based on a generic explanation formalism, as described in Feelders (1993) and Feelders and Daniels (2001). Explanation generation is supported by the two internal structures of the OLAP data cube: the business model and the dimension hierarchies.…”
Section: Outline Of the Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We present a method that gives the OLAP analyst explanations for significant decreases or increases in business measures, identified at an aggregated level. Our method for automated diagnosis is based on a generic explanation formalism, as described in Feelders (1993) and Feelders and Daniels (2001). Explanation generation is supported by the two internal structures of the OLAP data cube: the business model and the dimension hierarchies.…”
Section: Outline Of the Thesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exception identification is a comparison activity by business analysts, based on the general diagnosis task, as depicted in Figure 1 (Feelders and Daniels 2001). The reference object r represents one element from…”
Section: Definition Of Exceptional Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations