Abstract:General equations for conservative yet dissipative (entropy producing) extended magnetohydrodynamics are derived from two-fluid theory. Keeping all terms generates unusual cross-effects, such as thermophoresis and a current viscosity that mixes with the usual velocity viscosity. While the Poisson bracket of the ideal version of this model has already been discovered, we determine its metriplectic counterpart that describes the dissipation. This is done using a new and general thermodynamic point of view to der… Show more
“…However, given that several variants of extended MHD possess Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations (Keramidas Charidakos et al 2014; Abdelhamid, Kawazura & Yoshida 2015; Lingam, Morrison & Miloshevich 2015 a ; Lingam, Morrison & Tassi 2015 b ; D'Avignon, Morrison & Lingam 2016; Lingam, Abdelhamid & Hudson 2016 a ; Lingam, Miloshevich & Morrison 2016 b ; Burby 2017; Miloshevich, Lingam & Morrison 2017), it would seem natural to utilize the gyromap and thus formulate the gyroviscous contributions for this class of models; after doing so, their equilibria and stability can be obtained by using the HAP approach along the lines of Andreussi et al (2010, 2012, 2013, 2016), Morrison et al (2014) and Kaltsas, Throumoulopoulos & Morrison (2017, 2018, 2020) where the stability of a variety of equilibria is analysed using Lagrangian, energy–Casimir and dynamically accessibility methods. Likewise, this approach could also be extended to relativistic MHD and XMHD models with HAP formulations (D'Avignon, Morrison & Pegoraro 2015; Grasso et al 2017; Kawazura, Miloshevich & Morrison 2017; Coquinot & Morrison 2020; Ludwig 2020). We mention in passing that it would be interesting to explore how the time-dependent regauging of Andreussi et al (2013) can be used to produce or remove the -effects, in a manner analogous to how rotation can produce or remove effects of the magnetic field using Larmor's theorem.…”
A Hamiltonian and action principle formalism for deriving three-dimensional gyroviscous magnetohydrodynamic models is presented. The uniqueness of the approach in constructing the gyroviscous tensor from first principles and its ability to explain the origin of the gyromap and the gyroviscous terms are highlighted. The procedure allows for the specification of free functions, which can be used to generate a wide range of gyroviscous models. Through the process of reduction, the noncanonical Hamiltonian bracket is obtained and briefly analysed.
“…However, given that several variants of extended MHD possess Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations (Keramidas Charidakos et al 2014; Abdelhamid, Kawazura & Yoshida 2015; Lingam, Morrison & Miloshevich 2015 a ; Lingam, Morrison & Tassi 2015 b ; D'Avignon, Morrison & Lingam 2016; Lingam, Abdelhamid & Hudson 2016 a ; Lingam, Miloshevich & Morrison 2016 b ; Burby 2017; Miloshevich, Lingam & Morrison 2017), it would seem natural to utilize the gyromap and thus formulate the gyroviscous contributions for this class of models; after doing so, their equilibria and stability can be obtained by using the HAP approach along the lines of Andreussi et al (2010, 2012, 2013, 2016), Morrison et al (2014) and Kaltsas, Throumoulopoulos & Morrison (2017, 2018, 2020) where the stability of a variety of equilibria is analysed using Lagrangian, energy–Casimir and dynamically accessibility methods. Likewise, this approach could also be extended to relativistic MHD and XMHD models with HAP formulations (D'Avignon, Morrison & Pegoraro 2015; Grasso et al 2017; Kawazura, Miloshevich & Morrison 2017; Coquinot & Morrison 2020; Ludwig 2020). We mention in passing that it would be interesting to explore how the time-dependent regauging of Andreussi et al (2013) can be used to produce or remove the -effects, in a manner analogous to how rotation can produce or remove effects of the magnetic field using Larmor's theorem.…”
A Hamiltonian and action principle formalism for deriving three-dimensional gyroviscous magnetohydrodynamic models is presented. The uniqueness of the approach in constructing the gyroviscous tensor from first principles and its ability to explain the origin of the gyromap and the gyroviscous terms are highlighted. The procedure allows for the specification of free functions, which can be used to generate a wide range of gyroviscous models. Through the process of reduction, the noncanonical Hamiltonian bracket is obtained and briefly analysed.
“…Remark 2. The dissipative bracket [•, •] defined above resembles the dissipative bracket (•, •) appearing in the metriplectic framework [3,17]. Both brackets are symmetric and bilinear.…”
Section: Lagrangian Systems With External Forcesmentioning
In this paper, we develop a Hamilton-Jacobi theory for forced Hamiltonian and Lagrangian systems. We study the complete solutions, particularize for Rayleigh systems and present some examples. Additionally, we present a method for the reduction and reconstruction of the Hamilton-Jacobi problem for forced Hamiltonian systems with symmetry. Furthermore, we consider the reduction of the Hamilton-Jacobi problem for a Čaplygin system to the Hamilton-Jacobi problem for a forced Lagrangian system.
“…In [Mor84a], Morrison introduces the metriplectic formalism as an extension of the Hamiltonian formalism in such a way that it includes a dissipation while the essence of a conserved quantity is not lost. It couples Poisson brackets, coming from the Hamiltonian symplectic formalism, with metric brackets, coming from out-of-equilibrium thermodynamics (see also [Mor84b], [Mor98]) and [CM20]). This formalism is able to describe systems with both Hamiltonian and dissipative components, and to model friction, electric resistivity, collisions and more.…”
In this article we analyze several mathematical models with singularities where the classical cotangent model is replaced by a b-cotangent model. We provide physical interpretations of the singular symplectic geometry underlying in b-cotangent bundles featuring two models: the canonical (or non-twisted) model and the twisted one. The first one models systems on manifolds with boundary and the twisted model represents Hamiltonian systems where the singularity of the system is in the fiber of the bundle. The twisted cotangent model includes (for linear potentials) the case of fluids with dissipation. We relate the complexity of the fluids in terms of the Reynolds number and the (non)-existence of cotangent lift dynamics. We also discuss more general physical interpretations of the twisted and non-twisted b-symplectic models. These models offer a Hamiltonian formulation for systems which are dissipative, extending the horizons of Hamiltonian dynamics and opening a new approach to study non-conservative systems.B. Coquinot is funded by the J.-P.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.