1990
DOI: 10.1007/bf02656538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general method for estimation of fracture surface roughness: Part I. Theoretical aspects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite inconsistencies in the results, some general consensus is now emerging among researchers [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Similar classes of materials are thought to exhibit similar behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite inconsistencies in the results, some general consensus is now emerging among researchers [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Similar classes of materials are thought to exhibit similar behavior.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated curves and fitting curves for DL of fracture surface were shown in Figure 7. It can be seen from Figure 7 that the fitting curve between lgs(t) and lg(t) of gray value distribution contour curve of fracture surface at the different horizontal position of the SEM is accordance with linear model: (6) Where a and b are constants related to the gray value distribution, the larger the a is, the larger the D L is, the more complex the contour curve is, and the more fine structure is. From Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…But , the reports on the micro-morphology characteristics of fracture surface found that an uneven fracture surface with low smoothness would formed during subjecting to external load due to the different material structure and molding parameters, and the surface topography of the fracture had multi-levels [4][5][6]. The much finer structure in the fracture surface will appear constantly with the increasing of magnification times of the scanning electron microscope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where λ 0 is the actual measured length of fracture profile and L is equivalent straight path (projected length). RL can vary between 1 and ∞ depending on the irregularity of the fracture profile [28,29]. This parameter can be used to quantify the crack deflection and could be an accurate criterion for comparing the fatigue crack paths in different microstructures.…”
Section: Crack Path Analysis and Fractographymentioning
confidence: 99%