Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference 2008
DOI: 10.2118/19309-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Method for Calculating Subsurface CO

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The third phase dealt with the estimation of theoretical capacity within each identified geological province. At present, various calculation methods have been proposed to know the storage capacity of a rock formation [22,10,23,20,24,25,2]. They have been applied to different country projects within their respective areas and still there is uncertainty.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third phase dealt with the estimation of theoretical capacity within each identified geological province. At present, various calculation methods have been proposed to know the storage capacity of a rock formation [22,10,23,20,24,25,2]. They have been applied to different country projects within their respective areas and still there is uncertainty.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a closed aquifer (a volume of water that can not exit the aquifer) basic physics indicate that the storage capacity is limited due to compressibility and pressure build up limitations [1,2]. In the pressure build up is evenly distributed throughout in a volume of water, the mass of CO 2 that can be stored is directly connected to the pressure build up:…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect was modelled for a typical aquifer [2,20]: -local pressure increase to honour injectivity can reach 10 MPa for the aquifer studied; -average pressure increase to inject a given mass of CO 2 with time will be directly proportional to the size of the domain and Equation (2), ranging from 1 to 24 MPa in the case studied. These papers illustrate the fact that local pressure increase at wells to honour injectivity can be very high compared to typical geomechanical / capillary entry constraints, hence average pressure increase in the aquifer is much smaller than pressure increase at wells, and in the case of a closed aquifer it may not be technically feasible to increase the average aquifer pressure up to the maximum allowable increase while injecting with significant CO 2 rates.…”
Section: Negative Effects On Co 2 Storage Capacity -Downsidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation