1993
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-57155-8_238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general lower bound on the I/O-complexity of comparison-based algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While our parameter space is constrained to a coarse grained scenario which is typical of the CGM constraints for parallel computation, we show that this parameter space is both interesting and appropriate for EM computation. Once the expression for the general lower bounds reported by [1,26,3] is specialized for the subset of the parameter space that we consider, it becomes fully compatible with our results. This answers questions of Cormen [7] and Vitter [27] on the apparent contradictions between the results of [11] and the previously stated lower bounds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…While our parameter space is constrained to a coarse grained scenario which is typical of the CGM constraints for parallel computation, we show that this parameter space is both interesting and appropriate for EM computation. Once the expression for the general lower bounds reported by [1,26,3] is specialized for the subset of the parameter space that we consider, it becomes fully compatible with our results. This answers questions of Cormen [7] and Vitter [27] on the apparent contradictions between the results of [11] and the previously stated lower bounds.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…More recently, researchers have designed externalmemory algorithms for a number of problems in different areas, such as in computational geometry [19] and graph theoretic computation [5,14]. In [6] a general connection between the comparison-complexity and the I/O complexity of a given problem is shown, and in [4] alternative solutions for some of the problems in [14] and [19] are derived by developing and using dynamic external-memory data structures.…”
Section: Previous Results In I/o-efficient Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, unlike our algorithm that "hides" all I/O in the buffered range tree, the algorithm is very I/O specific. That both algorithms are optimal follows from the (N log 2 N + R) comparison model lower bound and the results in [9] and [10].…”
Section: Application: Orthogonal Line Segmentmentioning
confidence: 93%