2014
DOI: 10.14232/ejqtde.2014.1.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general Lipschitz uniqueness criterion for scalar ordinary differential equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, an extensive collection of uniqueness criteria is available in the monograph [1], and research has continued to add and refine such conditions, cf. [3, 5]. So far, the results ensuring existence and uniqueness of solutions for Stieltjes differential equations cover Picard and Peano type theorems (see [8, Section 7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, an extensive collection of uniqueness criteria is available in the monograph [1], and research has continued to add and refine such conditions, cf. [3, 5]. So far, the results ensuring existence and uniqueness of solutions for Stieltjes differential equations cover Picard and Peano type theorems (see [8, Section 7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniqueness for differential equations is an old subject far from being solved, see [1,11] and references therein, and that still sparks interest in researching [4,6,7,8,12]. In this section we show how our general version of the formula of change of variables yields new effective conditions for uniqueness.…”
Section: Uniqueness Criteria For Ode'smentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, for all (t, x) ∈ U , t > 0, we have Notice that ϕ(x) > x for x > 0, and therefore we cannot deduce from (3.25) that a Nagumo condition is satisfied. Morevorer, it is important to note that f does not satisfy any local Lipschitz condition with respect to x or with respect to t, and therefore (3.23) falls outside the scope of recent uniqueness results such as those in [7,12].…”
Section: ⊓ ⊔mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By taking either (u 1 , u 2 ) = (0, 1) or (u 1 , u 2 ) = (1, 0) this result covers both the classical Lipschitz uniqueness theorem and the previous alternative version. Moreover this result has been remarkably generalized in [8] by Diblík, Nowak and Siegmund by allowing the vector (u 1 , u 2 ) to depend on t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Uniqueness for ODEs is an important and quite old subject, but still an active field of research [7][8][9], being Lipschitz uniqueness theorem the cornerstone on the topic. Besides the existence of many generalizations of that theorem, see [1,6,10], one recent and fruitful line of research has been the searching for alternative or weaker forms of the Lipschitz condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%