The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1214/aoap/1075828056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general limit theorem for recursive algorithms and combinatorial structures

Abstract: Limit laws are proven by the contraction method for random vectors of a recursive nature as they arise as parameters of combinatorial structures such as random trees or recursive algorithms, where we use the Zolotarev metric. In comparison to previous applications of this method, a general transfer theorem is derived which allows us to establish a limit law on the basis of the recursive structure and the asymptotics of the first and second moments of the sequence. In particular, a general asymptotic normality … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
154
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
154
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Asymptotic Normality. By applying either the contraction method (see Neininger and Rüschendorf [2004]) or the refined method of moments (see Hwang [2003]), we can establish the convergence in distribution of the centered and normalized random variables (X n − μ n )/σ n to the standard normal distribution, where μ n := E(X n ) and σ 2 n := V(X n ). The latter is also useful in providing stronger results such as the following.…”
Section: :12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymptotic Normality. By applying either the contraction method (see Neininger and Rüschendorf [2004]) or the refined method of moments (see Hwang [2003]), we can establish the convergence in distribution of the centered and normalized random variables (X n − μ n )/σ n to the standard normal distribution, where μ n := E(X n ) and σ 2 n := V(X n ). The latter is also useful in providing stronger results such as the following.…”
Section: :12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fixed-point problem in Theorem 1.1 mirrors the execution of a message passing algorithm on the Galton-Watson tree. The study of this fixed-point problem, for which we use the contraction method [41], is the key technical ingredient of our proof. We believe that this strategy provides an elegant framework for tackling many other problems in the theory of random graphs as well.…”
Section: Further Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As already mentioned, recurrences of this form come up in various fields, see Rösler and Rüschendorf [83] and Neininger and Rüschendorf [70] for many concrete examples. Just to name a few, possible applications range from complexity measures of recursive algorithms (e.g., the number of key comparisons used by Quicksort, Mergesort or Quickselect) to parameters of random trees (e.g., the size of tries and m-ary search trees, path lengths in digital search trees, (PATRICIA) tries and m-ary search trees or the number of leaves in quadtrees) to quantities of stochastic geometry (e.g., the number of maxima in right triangles).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Up to the relaxed independence assumption (1.4), this is the framework of Neininger and Rüschendorf [70], where some general convergence results are shown for appropriate normalizations of the Y n . The content of this thesis is to additionally study the rates of convergence in such general limit theorems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation