A General Integral Method for one dimensional ablation

A Comparison of Quasi One-Dimensional and Two-Dimensional Ablation Models for Subliming Ablators

“…The quasi one-dimensional and two-dimensional ablation (cylindrical) codes are validated with the results available in literature, and the results are found to be in good agreement. The results obtained through the quasi one-dimensional ablation code compare well with those of Landau [3] and the general integral method (GIM) of Venkateshan and Solaiappan [4]. Figure 4 shows this comparison.…”

“…Venkateshan and Solaiappan [4] showed that there is a general integral relation, which is independent of the choice of a profile, and is valid for any general time-dependent heat flux at the boundary. This method does not involve any specific approximating profile, as is the case with the standard integral methods, and hence was referred to as the general integral method (GIM).…”

Análisis de impacto y solidificación de una gota de material cerámico en un proceso de proyección térmica por plasma mediante el método de redes

“…Stefan (Lozano y Reemsten, 1981), aproximaciones de Frederick y Greif a los problemas con condiciones de contorno de primera clase (Frederick y Greif, 1985), soluciones aproximadas en placas finitas (Gutman, 1986), determinación de procesos de congelación (Cleland et al, 1987) y otros problemas (Oliver y Sunderland, 1987;Cho y Sunderland, 1974;Cerrato et al, 1989aCerrato et al, , 1989bTao, 1981Tao, , 1989Koichi y Kozo, 1990;Dursunkaya y Nair, 1990;Venkateshan y Kothari, 1987;Venkateshan y Solaiappan, 1990;Lecomte y Batsale, 1991;Zhong et al, 1991;Zhang et al, 1993b;Goodman y Shea, 1960;Zhang et al, 1993a;Nyros y Hsieh, 1994;Zubair y Chaudry, 1994;Hwang et al, 1994;Blackwell y Hogan, 1994;Ji y Bu-xuan, 1995;Loulou y Delaunay, 1997;Kahranan, 1998;Abhat, 1983Eyres et al, 1946Kumar y Raikar, 1988;Runnels y Carey, 1991;Hunter y Kuttler, 1989Ramos et al,1991Ramos et al, , 1994aRamos et al, , 1994bShastri, 1998).…”