2007
DOI: 10.1080/14703290701240929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general framework for tracking and analysing learning processes in computer‐supported collaborative learning environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, this study provides some evidence for the adoption of a collaborative software system hosted via the cloud to support mentorship in the online dissertation process. The use of SharePoint is useful for collaboration just as collaborative technologies have been shown useful in the distance education classroom as a communication tool, a repository and a contribution tracker (Chan and van Aalst 2004;Jermann, Soller, and Lesgold 2004;Pozzi et al 2007). When used for interaction, it supports doctoral candidates' sense of connectedness and satisfaction, two factors associated with persistence and completion of the dissertation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, this study provides some evidence for the adoption of a collaborative software system hosted via the cloud to support mentorship in the online dissertation process. The use of SharePoint is useful for collaboration just as collaborative technologies have been shown useful in the distance education classroom as a communication tool, a repository and a contribution tracker (Chan and van Aalst 2004;Jermann, Soller, and Lesgold 2004;Pozzi et al 2007). When used for interaction, it supports doctoral candidates' sense of connectedness and satisfaction, two factors associated with persistence and completion of the dissertation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concerns include increasing completion rates, addressing basic curriculum standards, student questionnaire overload, accountability and measuring teaching effectiveness and quality. Although to date the field of learning analytics has largely focused on learner progression and developing lead indicators of student attrition (Campbell, De Blois, & Oblinger, 2007;Fritz, 2011), there is much potential (and some early research) in using student interaction data to establish indicators of more complex concepts such as knowledge construction (Pozzi, Manca, Persico, & Sarti, 2007), sense of community (Dawson, 2006;Gasevic, Adesope, Joksimovic, & Kovanovic, submitted), creativity (Dawson, 2010;Dawson, McWilliam, & Tan, 2011), and self-regulated learning (Biswas, Jeong, Kinnebrew, Sulcer, & Roscoe, 2010;Winne & Hadwin, 2013).…”
Section: Assessment Of Literaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers such as Macfadyen and Dawson (2010) Debate, discourse tools, give and take interactions in knowledge development (Pozzi et al, 2007) The media literacies described are still reliant upon an individual student demonstrating a certain level of competency in the more traditional literacies (Jenkins et al, 2006). A student who has limited reading and writing proficiency will continue to struggle with new media literacies.…”
Section: Assessment Of Literaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is no longer understood as a mere passive storage of contents, but with the aim to generate actions and solutions in various contexts in which the concepts are applied (Pozzi et al 2007, Manca 2008). …”
Section: Learning Communitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%