2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2021.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general framework for the numerical analysis of high-order finite difference solvers for nonlinear multi-term time-space fractional partial differential equations with time delay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,[13][14][15][16] For that matter, credible and competent techniques for solving FPDEs are demanded. Researchers' assays have resulted in presenting efficient schemes for numerical solutions of different categories of FPDEs, such as weighted finite difference methods, [17][18][19][20][21] Laplace-Sumudu transform, 22 modified double Laplace decomposition method, 23 Bernoulli wavelet method, 24 Tau method, 25 Galerkin method, 26 Petrov-Galerkin method, 27 Legendre wavelet method, 28 Crank-Nickolson method, 29 Haar Wavelet Picard method, 30 collocation method, 31,32 operational Chebyshev wavelets method, 33 and Taylor wavelets method. 34 Classical and fractional KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equations are nonlinear partial differential equations that explain instability systems and unstable drift waves in plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,[13][14][15][16] For that matter, credible and competent techniques for solving FPDEs are demanded. Researchers' assays have resulted in presenting efficient schemes for numerical solutions of different categories of FPDEs, such as weighted finite difference methods, [17][18][19][20][21] Laplace-Sumudu transform, 22 modified double Laplace decomposition method, 23 Bernoulli wavelet method, 24 Tau method, 25 Galerkin method, 26 Petrov-Galerkin method, 27 Legendre wavelet method, 28 Crank-Nickolson method, 29 Haar Wavelet Picard method, 30 collocation method, 31,32 operational Chebyshev wavelets method, 33 and Taylor wavelets method. 34 Classical and fractional KdV-Burgers-Kuramoto equations are nonlinear partial differential equations that explain instability systems and unstable drift waves in plasma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the tremendous difficulty of finding exact solutions for many types of FDEs, many researchers have been interested in obtaining analytical and numerical solutions for such problems. Some of them are the finite difference (Hendy et al (2021)), predictor-corrector (Kumar and Gejji (2019)), wavelet operational matrix (Yi and Huang ( 2014)), Galerkin-Legendre spectral (Zaky et al (2020)), fractional-order Boubaker wavelets (Rabiei and Razzaghi (2021)), fractional Jacobi collocation (Abdelkawy et al (2020)) and artificial neural network (Pakdaman et al 2017) methods. Because of the globality of fractional calculus, it is preferable to use global numerical techniques to solve FDEs of various types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [30], the Adomian decomposition method was applied to solve impulsive nonclassical type differential equations with the Caputo fractional operator. Very recently, a number of studies in the direction of efficiency and performance of various computational methods have been given by researchers [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. In [40], authors have defined a novel fractional-order Lagrangian to study the motion of a beam on a nanowire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%