2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-20000-7_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A General Framework for Regulated Rewriting Based on the Applicability of Rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the definitions themselves, we can conclude (also confer [11], but mind the partially different definitions):…”
Section: Basic Results For Regulated Tree Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the definitions themselves, we can conclude (also confer [11], but mind the partially different definitions):…”
Section: Basic Results For Regulated Tree Automatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we consider matrix contextual array grammars and contextual array grammars with regular control and examine their generative power. In the 1-dimensional case, we obtain special results: the family of 1-dimensional array languages generated by contextual array grammars with regular control languages coincides with the family of regular 1-dimensional array languages over unary alphabets and with array images of the linear languages over alphabets with more than one letter; already for binary alphabets, regular control is strictly more powerful than matrix control, a phenomenon rarely observed in regulated rewriting (confer [10]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…ContA k is obvious from general results for grammars working on various kinds of objects and with specific regulating mechanisms, see [10].…”
Section: Matrix Contextual Array Grammarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth to note, see also [4], that if no other control is used, the priorities can be mapped to sets of atomic inhibitors. Indeed, a rule is inhibited precisely by the left side of each higher priority rule.…”
Section: Theorem 1 [1] Priorities Are Subsumed By Conditional Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%