Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - 2003
DOI: 10.3115/1119355.1119366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general framework for distributional similarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These measures give complementary perspectives on the similarity between the predicates, as the cosine similarity is symmetric between the LHS and RHS predicates, while BInc takes into account the directionality of the inference relation. Preliminary experiments with other measures, such as those of Lin (1998) and Weeds and Weir (2003) did not yield additional improvements.…”
Section: Feature Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measures give complementary perspectives on the similarity between the predicates, as the cosine similarity is symmetric between the LHS and RHS predicates, while BInc takes into account the directionality of the inference relation. Preliminary experiments with other measures, such as those of Lin (1998) and Weeds and Weir (2003) did not yield additional improvements.…”
Section: Feature Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, measures and weights have been extensively compared so far (Lee 1999;Curran and Moens 2002a;Weeds et al 2004), with varied results. Weeds and Wier's work (Weeds and Weir 2003) is worth attention here-they proposed new measures, namely, precision and recall, considering the context matching process as information retrieval. They also proposed a combined approach, which is generalization of several distributional similarity measures with tunable meta-parameters.…”
Section: Distributional Similaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they calculate the synonymy between two relations by comparing the arguments with which they occur. Several methods have been proposed [30,31,52,49,54], which differ in the representation of the predicates, the extracted features and the function used to compute the similarity of the feature vectors. To be effective, distributional metrics must rely on some weighting scheme over the relation features.…”
Section: Synonym Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%