2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11128-015-1148-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general framework for complete positivity

Abstract: Complete positivity of quantum dynamics is often viewed as a litmus test for physicality, yet it is well known that correlated initial states need not give rise to completely positive evolutions. This observation spurred numerous investigations over the past two decades attempting to identify necessary and sufficient conditions for complete positivity. Here we describe a complete and consistent mathematical framework for the discussion and analysis of complete positivity for correlated initial states of open q… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
139
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it turns out, quantum operations can always be modeled as interactions of the input system with an environment, initially factorized from (and independent of) the input system, and discarded after the interaction took place [1][2][3][4][5]. Such a model, however, is not universally valid, but relies on an initial factorization condition.The question then naturally arises [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]: what happens when the initial factorization condition does not hold, namely, when system and environment are, already before the interaction is turned on, correlated? While this question arguably originated from practical motivations (e.g., the difficulty to experimentally enforce the initial factorization assumption), it soon moved to a more fundamental level, in an attempt to challenge the very physical arguments often put forth to promote CP dynamics as the only "physically reasonable" reduced dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As it turns out, quantum operations can always be modeled as interactions of the input system with an environment, initially factorized from (and independent of) the input system, and discarded after the interaction took place [1][2][3][4][5]. Such a model, however, is not universally valid, but relies on an initial factorization condition.The question then naturally arises [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]: what happens when the initial factorization condition does not hold, namely, when system and environment are, already before the interaction is turned on, correlated? While this question arguably originated from practical motivations (e.g., the difficulty to experimentally enforce the initial factorization assumption), it soon moved to a more fundamental level, in an attempt to challenge the very physical arguments often put forth to promote CP dynamics as the only "physically reasonable" reduced dynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one would expect, by allowing the input system and its environment to start in a correlated state, it is possible that the reduced dynamics of the system are not CP anymore. The possibility of exploring phenomena outside the CP framework attracted considerable interest [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], in particular in connection with the possibility of circumventing thermodynamic or information-theoretic tenet like, e.g., the second law of thermodynamics (by anomalous heat flow [17,18]) or the data-processing inequality (by anomalous increase of distinguishability [20], by entanglement revivals via local operations [9,[21][22][23], or by violating the no-cloning theorem [19]). In the language of the theory of open quantum systems, all such violations are interpreted as signatures of the fact that the underlying global evolution is non-divisible [20][21][22][23][24], i.e., it cannot be decomposed into a chain of CP maps across successive time intervals.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, there exists a one-by-one link between this inequality and CP [53]. Moreover, the standard notion of CP only makes sense for linear dynamics [49,52,90] and, as mentioned by Pechukas [50] as well as by Shaji and Sudarshan [54], it does not need to be a physical requirement in spite of its mathematical attractiveness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shabani and Lidar showed that the above-mentioned condition is not only sufficient but also necessary for complete positivity of the corresponding map [9,10]. Recently, some examples were provided to show that the relation between complete positivity and quantum discord is not generalized to all cases [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%