2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(01)00853-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general coupled cluster study of the N2 molecule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To further increase the reliability of the dynamic electron correlation treatment, we are also extending LUCIAREL by merging it with a new multireference coupled cluster ͑MRCC͒ method 37,38 opening for Kramersrestricted MRCC treatments. Based on KR-MCSCF wave functions, this method will allow for coupled cluster calculations on heavy-element molecules with an arbitrary number of open shells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further increase the reliability of the dynamic electron correlation treatment, we are also extending LUCIAREL by merging it with a new multireference coupled cluster ͑MRCC͒ method 37,38 opening for Kramersrestricted MRCC treatments. Based on KR-MCSCF wave functions, this method will allow for coupled cluster calculations on heavy-element molecules with an arbitrary number of open shells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weaknesses are related to low levels of excitations employed in situations where the single-configuration reference is clearly poor, for instance dissociating or quasi-degenerated situations or systems like ozone, C 2 , N 2 , the NO dimer and others. [10,11,[32][33][34] In those cases, triple or higher excitations have to be included in the cluster expansion. In a recent benchmark study on excitation energies [35] it was shown that CCSD or CC2 is less accurate than complete active space perturbation theory of the second order (or CASPT2, see below)-in the ionization-potential-electron-affinity (IPEA) formulation [36] -for systems with closed-shell ground states.…”
Section: Propagator Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 These calculations thus go beyond previous full configuration interaction ͑FCI͒ studies, which used the frozen-core (10 e) approximation. 1,6 Allelectron FCI calculations ͓which retain all elements of the configuration interaction ͑CI͒ vector͔ for this system remain currently out of reach ͑the D 2h space contains roughly 1.8 ϫ10 11 determinants͒. While the DMRG and CC theories should be seen as providing a hierarchy of approximations to the FCI result, our calculations have been carried out to a very high level (M ϭ4000 for DMRG, and up to hextuple excitations for CC theory͒, yielding near-FCI quality numerical results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%