1982
DOI: 10.1016/0165-0114(82)90005-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general class of fuzzy operators, the demorgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
204
0
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 512 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
204
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one potential drawback of the aforementioned operators is that the results are sensitive to the value of an operator-related parameter, and a minor change in the value of this parameter could reflect significant variations in the final decision. Similar concerns are associated with various other well-known operators such as Dombi's operator [11,12], Hamacher's operator [13], Frank's operator [14], Weber's operators [15], Dubois and Prade's operator [16], and Schweizer's operator [17], among many others. However, there is one fuzzy operator that does not contain any operator-related parameter, and therefore does not suffer from the issues that arise with fuzzy operators mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one potential drawback of the aforementioned operators is that the results are sensitive to the value of an operator-related parameter, and a minor change in the value of this parameter could reflect significant variations in the final decision. Similar concerns are associated with various other well-known operators such as Dombi's operator [11,12], Hamacher's operator [13], Frank's operator [14], Weber's operators [15], Dubois and Prade's operator [16], and Schweizer's operator [17], among many others. However, there is one fuzzy operator that does not contain any operator-related parameter, and therefore does not suffer from the issues that arise with fuzzy operators mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to no parameter selected in [29], the proposed MADM based on Dombi aggregation operators is more flexible than the approach provided in [29]. For further comparison, the existing related decision-making approaches [51][52][53] based on some Dombi operations cannot deal with the decision-making problem with NCSs. However, the decision-making method presented in this paper can describe attributes with interval neutrosophic sets and single valued neutrosophic sets information simultaneously.…”
Section: Comparison Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one potential drawback of the aforementioned operators is that the results are sensitive to the value of an operator-related parameter, and a minor change in the value of this parameter could reflect significant variations in the final decision. Similar concerns are associated with various other well-known operators such as Dombi's operator [5,6], Hamacher's operator [7], Frank's operator [8], Weber's operators [9], Dubois and Prade's operator [10], and Schweizer's operator [11], among many others. However, one operator, namely the Einstein operator, does not suffer from the drawback, since there is no operatorrelated parameter associated with that.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%