1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf02817189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A general argument against superluminal transmission through the quantum mechanical measurement process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
185
0
4

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
185
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the case considered by Refs. [15] and [16]. Independently of the demonstrations made in Refs.…”
Section: Operator H0 Is Of the Formmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is the case considered by Refs. [15] and [16]. Independently of the demonstrations made in Refs.…”
Section: Operator H0 Is Of the Formmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…But, it is common belief that these influences cannot be used for communication. In the literature, one can find several moreor-less complete demonstrations that the phenomenon of instantaneous collapse of the state function, as it is described by quantum theory, does not provide a means of faster-than-light communication between observers, [14], [15], [16], [17], and [18]. However, the argument has never been made with every logical step spelled out explicitly.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eberhard [24] and Ghirardi et al [25] had given such demonstrations as early as the 1970s, and others also gave similar general demonstrations such as Busch [26].…”
Section: A General Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, as Bel1 [l] showed, quantum correlations could not arise in any theory in which all variables obey relativistic causality [2]. On the other hand, quantum correlations themselves obey relativistic causality-we cannot exploit quantum correlations to transmit signals at superluminal speeds [3] (or at any speed). That quantum mechanics combines nonlocality and causality is wondrous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%