Confronting Equity and Inclusion Incidents on Campus 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9780429264825-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Genealogy of “Diversity”: From the 1960s to Problematic Diversity Agendas and Contemporary Activism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human diversity awareness is a timeless concept, but understanding the in the United States, the value of diversity and inclusion is a relatively new concept [1]. As leaders in the armed services, corporate, community, and academic universities recognised the need to educate During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, they started advocating scholars found by teaching combatants, personnel, graduates, as well as common people about racial inequality as that of the "right thing to do" [2]. Over time, diversity educators incorporated other barriers to inclusion into diversity training programmes, such as gender, sexual orientation, age, ethnicity, religion, disability, and gender identity [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human diversity awareness is a timeless concept, but understanding the in the United States, the value of diversity and inclusion is a relatively new concept [1]. As leaders in the armed services, corporate, community, and academic universities recognised the need to educate During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, they started advocating scholars found by teaching combatants, personnel, graduates, as well as common people about racial inequality as that of the "right thing to do" [2]. Over time, diversity educators incorporated other barriers to inclusion into diversity training programmes, such as gender, sexual orientation, age, ethnicity, religion, disability, and gender identity [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%