2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A genealogical survey of Australian registered dog breeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
65
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
11
65
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For dog, previous studies [10,24-26] applied inbreeding approaches to compute N e , with average values close to 100 (ranging from 17 to 1090), which is in agreement with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For dog, previous studies [10,24-26] applied inbreeding approaches to compute N e , with average values close to 100 (ranging from 17 to 1090), which is in agreement with our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We would also like to underline that the Pearson correlations between EqG and IBD estimators were moderate, indicating that the regression suggested by Nagy et al [26] between pedigree knowledge and IBD is not straightforward.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…), while it was much lower in Australia (0.048%, N e = 1090) (Shariflou et al . ) and even negative in Finland (Maki et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the mutation is relatively neutral with respect to reproductive fitness, and has not been actively selected for as a correlated trait by breeders, we can also estimate mutation age based on the mutation frequency. We used effective population sizes of 50 and 100 animals, based on those estimated for Terrier breeds in Australia [19]. Under the same expansion estimates, we obtain estimates of 10 generations (25% expansion) and 24 generations (10% expansion).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Age Of The Adamts17 Snpmentioning
confidence: 99%