A Genealogical Approach to Organizational Life Chances: The Parent-Progeny Transfer among Silicon Valley Law Firms, 1946–1996

Abstract

three anonymous reviewers for their invaluable assistance and feedback on earlier drafts. Any errors or misrepresentations are the author's.Data on Silicon Valley law firms over a 50-year period were used to study the genealogy of organizational populations and its consequences for organizational life chances when a member of an existing firm leaves to found a new firm. Hypotheses and subsequent analysis suggest that the transfer of resources and routines between a parent organization and its progeny decreases life chances for the parent firm and increases life chances for the progeny. The results are contingent on the founder's previous position in the parent firm and time since the parenting event. In addition, I find that progeny have lower life chances when the parent is a failing firm, when there are multiple parents, and when the founder is a former senior partner of a large law firm.0sociologists have long considered the effects of the transfer of resources and routines from old to new organizations. The 1980s featured a relatively brief but active line of research that attempted to establish a framework for understanding new organizations as the progeny of parent organizations. Brittain and Freeman (1980) examined factors that lead organizational members to leave and start new organizations. Other scholars, such as McKelvey (1982), Carroll (1984a), Astley (1985), Freeman (1986), Hannan and Freeman (1986), and Romanelli (1989), have continued research in this vein. Each of these studies posited that some amount of a parent organization's "blueprint" would carry over to the new organization through the career experiences of the offspring's founders. Yet, despite this past work, at least two areas remain underdeveloped. First, there has been little formalization linking a genealogical framework with many of the key outcome variables of organizational sociology, such as an organization's structure, ability to adapt, likelihood of success (e.g., survival, profitability), innovativeness, or the attainment of organizational members. Consequently, scholars have overlooked another possible answer to one of the key questions raised in the past twenty-five years of organizational sociology, "Why do so many organizations look alike?" (Meyer and Rowan, 1977; Hannan and Freeman, 1977). Second, while past efforts have emphasized the source of progeny, there have been few attempts to assess empirically the consequences of transferring resources and routines from parent organizations to their progeny. As a result, there are studies of the types of firms that parent new firms (Brittain and Freeman, 1980) and of the effect of founders' previous affiliations and experiences on new firms' success (e.g., BrOderl, Preisendorfer, and Ziegler, 1992; Burton, Sorensen, and Beckman, 2002) but no bridge between the two. This paper addresses each of these unexplored areas by developing and testing a framework to understand organizational life chances, one of the key outcomes in organizational sociology. Often associated with populatio...

Renascent entrepreneurship

“…Klepper 2002;Phillips 2002) -is not found to have an effect on nascent entrepreneurship. It is likely that prior industry experience will only have a positive effect when the intended new business will be active in an industry that is related to this experience.…”

Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry

“…Agarwal et al (2004) find that spawns in the disk drive industry last longer than other entrants and Phillips (2002) also finds that spawned ventures survive longer than other entrants in his study of law firms. Agarwal et al (2004) argue that spawns will possess superior industry-specific knowledge compared to their competitors, which manifests itself into better performance.…”

Disagreements and intra-industry spinoffs

“…A few parallel studies have been conducted for automobiles in Great Britain (Boschma and Wenting [2007]) and automobiles (von Rhein [2008]) and lasers (Buenstorf [2007]) in Germany. Intra-industry spinoffs have also been studied in U.S. law firms (Phillips [2002]) and Australian and New Zealand wine producers (Roberts et al [2007]). The main focus of these studies is on the rate at which firms spawn intra-industry spinoffs and the performance of the spinoffs.…”