2019
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1168/6/062004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Gene-Inspired Malware Detection Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Machine learning models trained on static data have shown good detection accuracy. Chen et al [5] achieved 96% detection accuracy using statically extracted sequences of API calls to train a Random Forest model. However, static data have been demonstrated to be quite vulnerable to concept drift [12,13].…”
Section: Malware Detection With Static or Post-collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Machine learning models trained on static data have shown good detection accuracy. Chen et al [5] achieved 96% detection accuracy using statically extracted sequences of API calls to train a Random Forest model. However, static data have been demonstrated to be quite vulnerable to concept drift [12,13].…”
Section: Malware Detection With Static or Post-collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the huge numbers of new malware appearing each day, the detection of malware samples needs to be automated [2]. Signature-matching methods are not resilient enough to handle obfuscation techniques or to catch unseen malware types and as such, automated methods of generating detection rules, such as machine learning, have been widely proposed [3][4][5][6]. ese approaches typically analyse samples when the file is first ingested, either using static code-based methods or by observing dynamic behaviours in a virtual environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the construction of sample classification characteristics, Qian et al [6]. analyzed the sample's attributes and characteristics information by observing the dynamic behavior of the sample in the sandbox and recording its detailed log information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, through the sandbox-based program dynamic characteristic detection technology, some researchers have collected the sample's behavioral characteristics and static analysis-based sample characteristics code, in order to get the test sample from them [5]. However, the rapidly evolution of malware variants and the constantly introduction of new technologies highlights the limitations of these traditional analysis methods, and meanwhile, methods that rely too much on manual experience lag far behind rapidly updated malicious programs [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. [11] achieved 96% detection accuracy using staticallyextracted sequences of API calls to train a Random Forest model. However, in direct comparison with dynamic data, static data performed less well and did not even improve accuracy when used to augment dynamic datasets [2].…”
Section: Malware Detection Using Dynamic Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%